This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.

Contact Us

What can we help you find?

Top Searches

PROTAC

ADC

RNA

ADME

OLIGO

Permeability and Transporter Study

Most discovery projects focus on developing orally administered drugs. Therefore, selecting an appropriate in vitro permeability study model to predict human absorption is imperative in drug development. Drug transporters can affect drug’s absorption, distribution, elimination, and other in vivo processes, thereby affecting the efficacy and safety of drugs, and play a crucial role in drug‑drug interactions (DDIs) 1.

  • Overview

  • Permeability Assays

  • Transporter Assays

  • Case Studies

  • Agency/Organization Requirements

  • Experience

  • Factsheets

  • FAQs

  • Related Resources

  • Related Services

Overview

WuXi AppTec DMPK’s in vitro permeability and transporter platform provides a variety of models for permeability, transporter-mediated DDI, and hepatic uptake clearance assessment to meet the needs of high-throughput screening, mechanistic research, and application at different stages of drug development.

Learn More

Transporter Assays

Case Studies

  • Case 1
  • Case 2
    • pstudy-case.jpg

      A correlation between human absorption versus estimates from Caco-2 logPapp(A-B) derived from a collection of 25 commercially available drugs

      Figure 1

      WuXi AppTec DMPK's in vitro permeability and transporter platform pays great attention to in vitro to in vivo correlations (IVIVCs) of in vitro models. For example, the IVIVC validation of Caco-2 permeability model was carried out using model drugs to define the binning criteria in 2015. Since then, the experiment has been repeated annually, and the results are reproducible. As shown in Figure 1, in the experiment conducted in 2024, the Papp (A-B) values of 25 commercially available drugs correlated very well with the human absorption data 2 (R2 of 0.9205).

    • Limited BBB penetration.jpg

      BBB penetration assessment for 24 marketed drugs

      Figure 2

      Brain penetration is one of the key factors for CNS drug development. WuXi AppTec DMPK's in vitro permeability and transporter platform developed a “Screening Funnel” model for brain penetration assessment. Ten “CNS+” drugs (high brain penetration, triangles) and 14 “CNS-” drugs (low brain penetration, dots) were included in the validation (Figure 2). All these drugs were tested in BBB-PAMPA, and ten “CNS-” drugs (red dots) were excluded due to limited BBB penetration. The others were tested in the MDR1-MDCK I (NIH) assay, and four “CNS-” drugs (blue dots) were further excluded due to high P-gp efflux. The remaining 10 compounds were potential “CNS+” (high brain penetration) compounds and were classified correctly.

Agency/Organization Requirements

TransporterAssay TypeAgency/Organization Requirement
ABCP-gpMDR1-MDCK II, MDR1-MDCK I, Caco-2, and Vesicle‑MDR1
FDA, EMA, NMPA, PMDA, and ICH
BCRP
Caco-2 and Vesicle-BCRP
BSEP
Vesicle-BSEP
EMA, PMDA, and ICH

MRP2

Vesicle-MRP2
PMDA and ICH
MRP4
Vesicle-MRP4
PMDA
MRP3
Vesicle-MRP1
Not mentioned

MRP1

Vesicle-MRP1
SLC
OATP1B1
HEK293-OATP1B1
FDA, EMA, NMPA, PMDA, and ICH
OATP1B3
HEK293-OATP1B3

OAT1

HEK293-OAT1
OAT3
HEK293-OAT3
OCT2
HEK293-OCT2
MATE1
HEK293-MATE1
MATE2-K
HEK293-MATE2-K
OATP2B1
HEK293-OATP2B1
ICH
OCT1
HEK293-OCT1
EMA, PMDA, and ICH
PEPT1
HEK293-PEPT1
Not mentioned
PEPT2
HEK293-PEPT2
NTCP
HEK293-NTCP

Experience

  • 17+

    Years

    E1icon06.png
  • 40,000+

    Compounds per year

    E1icon11.png
  • 1,500+

    Studies for IND filing per year

    E1icon09.png

FAQs

  • What are the methods for in vitro permeability assessment?

    WuXi AppTec DMPK employs various in vitro permeability models aligned with global regulatory and organizational guidelines, including those set by FDA, EMA, NMPA, PMDA, and ICH, to predict drug absorption and tissue penetration. Our validated assays are as follows:

    • Non-cell-based models:

      • Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay (PAMPA): conventional Egg-PAMPA, Pion GIT-PAMPA, conventional BBB-PAMPA, and Pion BBB-PAMPA

    • Cell-based models:

      • Caco-2 cell-based unidirectional and bidirectional permeability assays

      • Wild-type MDCK I/II cell-based unidirectional and bidirectional permeability assays

      • MDR1-MDCK I/II cell-based unidirectional and bidirectional permeability assays

  • How does permeability affect the oral absorption of drugs?

    The oral absorption of drugs is related to their permeability, which can affect the rate and extent of absorption across the gastrointestinal tract and formulation strategies, and so on. High permeability generally leads to faster and more complete absorption, while low permeability may require formulation adjustments to increase passive permeability and/or inhibit efflux transporters for more absorption.

  • How does membrane permeability affect drug distribution?

    Permeability influences the ability of a drug to cross cell membranes, which in turn affects its distribution to various tissues and organs. High permeability facilitates extensive distribution, allowing drugs to reach target sites effectively, including those that are typically challenging to access, like the central nervous system. Conversely, low permeability can limit a drug’s distribution, potentially confining it to certain areas and impacting its therapeutic efficacy. In drug development, understanding and optimizing membrane permeability is essential to ensure that drugs can be efficiently delivered to their intended sites of action and achieve the desired therapeutic efficacy

  • How to select an appropriate in vitro model for P-gp/BCRP substrate/inhibition evaluation?

    WuXi AppTec DMPK has set up cell-based and vesicle-based models for P‑gp/BCRP substrate and inhibition assessment based on the recommendations of FDA, NMPA and other agencies. Cell-based models are suitable for relatively high permeability compounds, but may not be suitable for low permeable compounds, while the vesicle models can be used for low permeable compounds, but may fail to identify highly permeable compounds or highly non‑specific binding compounds as substrates. Therefore, we recommend selecting the appropriate model according to the properties of test compounds.

  • What kinds of compounds need to be tested for hepatic uptake clearance rather than hepatic metabolic clearance to predict in vivo clearance?

    For ECCS (Extended Clearance Classification System) Class 1B and some ECCS Class 3B compounds, which are acids and zwitterions with molecular weight greater than 400, hepatic uptake is the predominant clearance mechanism, and hepatic uptake clearance should be evaluated to predict in vivo clearance. The use of hepatic metabolic clearance would underestimate the in vivo clearance of these compounds.

Related Resources

References

  1. 1.

    Giacomini, K.M. et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nature reviews drug discovery 9, 215-236 (2010)

  2. 2.

    Suzanne, S. et al. Towards Prediction of in vivo intestinal absorption using a 96-well Caco-2 Assay. J. Pharm. Sci. 99, 32463265 (2010)

VIew More

Stay Connected

Keep up with the latest news and insights.

  • Email address*

    * Please check the filled content
  • First name*

    * Please check the filled content
  • Last name*

    * Please check the filled content
  • Company*

    * Please check the filled content

By clicking submit, you consent to WuXi AppTec DMPK collecting and processing the information you provide for our internal purposes, in accordance with our privacy policy.

* Please agree to the Privacy Policy

Thanks for signing up

Help us get to know you better! By customizing your email preferences, we can deliver curated content relevant to you.